DNP Residency II Assignment

DNP Residency II Assignment

Manuscript Development – Part II

Total Value: 35 Points

This assignment and scoring rubric were developed from the Squire 2.0 Guidelines and Guidelines for Reviewers located at: https://www.squire-statement.org/

Part I: Revision of the Previously Submitted Assignment (10 Points)

Students must revise Part I of the manuscript based on feedback received from the primary faculty. The revised Part I should reflect all recommended changes and improvements.

DNP Residency II Assignment

Grading Criteria (10 points):

  • Integration of Faculty Feedback (5 points): Demonstrates thorough incorporation of suggested revisions.
  • Clarity and Coherence (3 points): Writing is clear, well-organized, and maintains logical flow.
  • APA Formatting (2 points): Proper adherence to APA formatting, including citations and references.

Check tips on how to do your DNP PROJECT WRITING.

Part II: Expansion of the Manuscript (25 Points)

Students will add the following sections to the revised Part I manuscript. These sections should build upon the initial work and provide a complete analysis of the quality improvement project.

Results (10.5  Points)

DNP Residency II Assignment

What did you find?

  1. Initial steps of the intervention(s) and their evolution over time (e.g., timeline diagram, flow chart, or table), including modifications made to the intervention during the project (2 points)
  2. Findings:  Details of the process measures and outcomes (2 points)
  3. Contextual elements that interacted with the intervention(s) (2 points)
  4. Findings:  Observed associations between outcomes, interventions, and relevant contextual elements (3 point)
  5. Unintended consequences such as unexpected benefits, problems, failures, or costs associated with the intervention(s) (1 point)
  6. Details about missing data (0.5 points)

Discussion (11 Points)

Check tips on how to do your DNP PROJECT WRITING.

What does it mean?

  1. Summary (3 Points)
    • Key findings, including relevance to the rationale and specific aims (1.5 points)
    • Particular strengths of the project (1.5 points)
  2. Interpretation (4 Points)
    • Nature of the association between the intervention(s) and the outcomes (1 point)
    • Comparison of results with findings from other publications (1 point)
    • Impact of the project on people and systems (1 point)
    • Reasons for any differences between observed and anticipated outcomes, including the influence of context (0.5 point)
    • Costs and strategic trade-offs, including opportunity costs (0.5 point)
  3. Limitations (2 Points)
    • Limits to the generalizability of the work (0.5 points)
    • Factors that might have limited internal validity such as confounding, bias, or imprecision in the design, methods, measurement, or analysis (0.5 points)
    • Efforts made to minimize and adjust for limitations (1 point)
  4. Conclusions (2 Points)
    • Usefulness of the work (0.5 points)
    • Sustainability (0.5 points)
    • Potential for spread to other contexts (0.5 points)
    • Implications for practice and further study in the field (0.5 points)
    • Suggested next steps (0.5 points)

DNP Residency II Assignment

  1. Scholarship (3.5 Points)
    • The final manuscript, including both Parts I and II, should total 12 to 15 pages (excluding the title page and reference pages).
    • APA formatting should be followed, including page numbers, proper headings, and citations throughout the document.
    • Scholarly writing is expected, demonstrating strong critical thinking, synthesis of ideas, and a clear presentation of findings.

Check tips on how to do your DNP PROJECT WRITING.

Formatting and Submission Guidelines:

  • Manuscripts should be formatted in APA style (latest edition), including appropriate headings and citations.
  • Submit as a Word document (.docx) to the designated platform.
  • Ensure that all sections align with the SQUIRE 2.0 Guidelines for reporting quality improvement projects.

This assignment ensures that students produce a comprehensive, scholarly manuscript that adheres to structured quality improvement reporting standards.

Tags